{"id":1849,"date":"2019-09-12T09:28:33","date_gmt":"2019-09-12T14:28:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.talyarkoni.org\/blog\/?p=1849"},"modified":"2019-09-12T09:28:33","modified_gmt":"2019-09-12T14:28:33","slug":"the-parable-of-the-three-districts-a-projective-test-for-psychologists","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/talyarkoni.org\/blog\/2019\/09\/12\/the-parable-of-the-three-districts-a-projective-test-for-psychologists\/","title":{"rendered":"The parable of the three districts: A projective test for psychologists"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>A political candidate running for regional public office asked a famous political psychologist what kind of television ads she should air in three heavily contested districts: positive ones emphasizing her own record, or negative ones attacking her opponent&#8217;s record.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cYou&#8217;re in luck,\u201c\u009d said the psychologist. \u201cI have a new theory of persuasion that addresses exactly this question. I just published a paper containing four large studies that all strongly support the theory and show that participants are on average more persuaded by attack ads than by positive ones.\u201c\u009d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Convinced by the psychologist&#8217;s arguments and his confident demeanor, the candidate&#8217;s campaign ran carefully tailored attack ads in all three districts. She proceeded to lose the race by a landslide, with exit surveys placing much of the blame on the negative tone of her ads.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As part of the campaign post-mortem, the candidate asked the psychologist what he thought had gone wrong.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cOh, different things,\u201c\u009d said the psychologist. \u201cIn hindsight, the first district was probably too educated; I could see how attack ads might turn off highly educated voters. In the second district\u201c\u201cand I&#8217;m not going to tiptoe around the issue here\u2014I think the problem was sexism. You have a lot of low-SES working-class men in that district who probably didn&#8217;t respond well to a female candidate publicly criticizing a male opponent. And in the third district, I think the ads you aired were just too over the top. You want to highlight your opponent&#8217;s flaws subtly, not make him sound like a cartoon villain.\u201c\u009d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cThat all sounds reasonable enough,\u201c\u009d said the candidate. \u201cBut I&#8217;m a bit perplexed that you didn&#8217;t mention any of these subtleties ahead of time, when they might have been more helpful.\u201c\u009d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cWell,\u201c\u009d said the psychologist. \u201cThat would have been very hard to do. The theory is true <em>in general<\/em>, you see. But every situation is different.\u201c\u009d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A political candidate running for regional public office asked a famous political psychologist what kind of television ads she should air in three heavily contested districts: positive ones emphasizing her own record, or negative ones attacking her opponent&#8217;s record. \u201cYou&#8217;re in luck,\u201c\u009d said the psychologist. \u201cI have a new theory of persuasion that addresses exactly &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/talyarkoni.org\/blog\/2019\/09\/12\/the-parable-of-the-three-districts-a-projective-test-for-psychologists\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">The parable of the three districts: A projective test for psychologists<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"footnotes":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[3,77],"tags":[704,337,703,764],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pEZxN-tP","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/talyarkoni.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1849"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/talyarkoni.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/talyarkoni.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/talyarkoni.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/talyarkoni.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1849"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/talyarkoni.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1849\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1851,"href":"https:\/\/talyarkoni.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1849\/revisions\/1851"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/talyarkoni.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1849"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/talyarkoni.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1849"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/talyarkoni.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1849"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}